this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2010
3 points (100% like it)
3 up votes 0 down votes

doctrine

- frontpage+ frontpage5 readers

Discussion of various doctrinal concepts.

created by cookiecapera community for 1 month

MODERATORS

comments

cookiecaper 1 point2 points 1 month ago[-]

I think it's just a further demonstration that many of the Saints want to mix true doctrine with philosophies of men so that they can fit in better. They do it everywhere, they want to be like everyone else.

People should realize that Mormonism is not the religion for you if you just want to fit in. We're a peculiar people and we'll only seem stranger and stranger as the world delves deeper and deeper into apostasy. It's something you might as well get comfortable with.

NoGreaterLove 0 points1 point 24 days ago[-]

Eve

See ADAM, FORBIDDEN FRUIT, WOMAN. Scant knowledge is available to us of Eve (the wife of Adam) and her achievements in pre-existence and in mortality. Without question she was like unto her mighty husband Adam in intelligence and in devotion to righteousness during both her first and second estates of existence. She was placed on earth in the same manner as was Adam, the Mosaic account of the Lord creating her from Adam's rib being merely figurative. (Moses 3:20-25.)

Eve was the first woman; she became the mother of the whole human race, her very name signifying "mother of all living." (Moses 4:26; 1 Ne. 5:11.) Strictly speaking it was she who first partook of the forbidden fruit, with the resultant change in the physical body from a state of immortality to mortality. Adam thereafter partook in order to comply with the command to multiply and fill the earth with posterity. "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." (1 Tim. 2:14.)

Before the fall Eve was sealed to Adam in the new and everlasting covenant of marriage, a ceremony performed by the Lord before death entered the world and therefore one destined to last forever. (Moses 3:20-25.) After the fall the Lord said to her: "I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception. In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children, and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." (Moses 4:22.)

One of the most perfect summaries of the plan of salvation ever given fell from the lips of Eve: "Were it not for our transgression," she said, "we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient." (Moses 5:11.) Indeed, Eve is a joint-participant with Adam in all his ministry, and will inherit jointly with him all the blessings appertaining to his high state of exaltation.

(Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966], 242.)

As you can see Eve was deceived. Not Adam. She is a joint participant in Adam's ministry. It is not her ministry. Each gender has a role. Adam does not fill the role of womanhood and Eve does not fill the role of ministering. Each is a joint participant in the others role and each has something to give. One is not above the other in intelligence or greater than the other. This has been made clear by all modern day prophets. Anything taught to the contrary is against the teachings of our modern day prophets and therefore in contradiction to the Lord's teachings.

calico 0 points1 point 1 month ago[-]

BECAUSE THEY ARE FEMINISTS.

ryanjkirk [S] 0 points1 point 1 month ago[-]

This article is completely ridiculous. In addition to her logic fallacies and self-contradictions, she extrapolates doctrine that doesn't exist.

My wife got this link from facebook and was fairly repulsed by the article. I'm glad she doesn't feel the need to feel superior to me as I don't to her. What's wrong with equality?

Equality, by the way, is still hard to argue in the context of plural marriage and the ability to hold the priesthood.

peter 0 points1 point 1 month ago[-]

In addition to her logic fallacies and self-contradictions, she extrapolates doctrine that doesn't exist.

If you mean the author, his name is James Summerhays. I don't know if the sex of the author is relevant, but I thought I might clarify.